Some of the questions I have asked public works:
*When the testing for nitrates/bacteria was conducted, were there additional tests done to determine whether these nitrates were from human septic? For example, did you test for caffeine, Prozac, or other drug byproducts?
*If some homeowners overlook their ballots and do not vote on the project, will this “no vote” be considered a yes or no vote? Or will this homeowner simply have no voice in the matter because they failed to return the ballot?
* It appears that the Red Bluff treatment facility has reached its maximum capacity with regard to effluent treatment. Your website states that wet weather can cause flows to increase over 3,000,000 gallons per day and yet your treatment plant has a design capacity of 2,500,000 gallons per day. How will the facility handle 2600+ more homes? What improvements have been made so that the facility will be able to handle this increase?
* You stated that the $18,000 would pay for sewer pipe going to our home and for a family unit’s worth of underground pipe and for a portion of the pumping station. Doesn’t this mean that our family should own a portion of the new sewer system? It doesn’t make sense to charge us for equipment that is not within our home or on our property that you wish to use to provide a service that we will pay for. PG&E does not expect us to pay for anything beyond our breaker box. They own it; we are utilizing their service and the equipment that brings it to us. We are not being charged for the pipe that brings our natural gas to us; we are paying for the gas that we use. The same is true of the telephone company. They pay for the cables and they bring service to our home. We pay for service.
*Will the monthly service be flat rate or will it be metered?
*Why is the grant money only for the entity of the Antelope Sewer Project and not for the residents? It stands to make a profit and we don't. The economy is terrible and there could not be a worse time for presenting us with $28,000 of debt. From what I have read in the draft, it appears that low income families would qualify for assistance, but presently, even middle class families are hurting. With prices at the gas pump being high, food prices climbing, and wages staying the same, no one has an extra $100 a month, let alone $155 (That’s the real cost; the preliminary draft did not factor in the $10,000 fee to convert septic systems--I read about this in the newspaper--with the service fee as well, monthly costs will be $180). How do you plan to help middle class families?
*Would a homeowner be allowed to do a portion of the work himself? Oftentimes, labor prices can be quite inflated, and I am guessing we could rent a trencher for cheaper than a contractor is paid.
*If the county can’t afford to pay for this project, why don’t they start small, where nitrates are most troublesome and plan to incorporate the other part later? That’s how successful families work their budget...they pay as they go (and also why I have so many questions---we can’t afford this right now).
Looking at the city’s treatment plant being worked to capacity as it is, looking at the lack of funding, and considering that despite the fact that septic will be diverted to the city, residents will still be drinking from the same wells, it seems prudent to downsize this project for the time being. Like the rest of the country, we in Tehama County need to look for ways to save money, not put families at risk through a plan that threatens their financial well-being. Is this an all-or-nothing plan since there has been almost $200,000 paid out for PACE to draw this up? Is there any way the plan could be modified to serve a smaller area since you are not building a new treatment facility in Antelope, but are merely pumping septic to the city?
***************************************************
An engineer from public works states that comments on the project must be received by March 23rd.
Mail your questions/concerns to:
Tehama County Public Works
9380 San Benito
Gerber, CA 96035
Please read the preliminary draft and ask questions, as I have. My neighbor wrote a letter and asked what would happen if a homeowner was unable to make the payment. What procedures would the city take? Is it forseeable that someone could lose their home? She also asked if there would be an opt-out. Good questions, and I am sure that after you research this, read the draft and related news articles, that you will have questions as well. Ask them.
Write to or call your supervisors and city councilmembers in addition to public works. Tell them how it will affect you and your family to pay almost $200 a month for 20 years, a cost that is too high,
especially when there are other solutions.
Those living in the Roundup area will tell you that the nitrate levels appear
to have a correlation to the opening and closing of the dam gates.
Gates closed, nitrate level up. Gates open, nitrate level down.
How many tests were done and at what time of year?
What if they only tested for nitrates while the gates were closed?
So while I think the focus should be limited to the Roundup area where nitrates have been high,
I am not convinced that a sewer system is the answer. Get these people on city water.
Better yet, test the Antelope water again now that Lake Red Bluff is gone.
Property owners deserve due diligence. A 5 or 10 year study is in order, because our water might get cleaner
every year once the water is able to move through the area instead of sitting in one place.
If you would like to discuss this issue with other Antelope homeowners
or if you'd like to read what others have to say,
check out the Red Bluff is my Town facebook page.